Washington: Several NATO countries are questioning their commitment to buying the American-made F-35 fighter jet, which could pose a threat to the future of the under-fire program. And that means breaking with President Donald Trump’s relentless trade posture and his handling of the Russia-Ukraine war.
Portugal’s defence minister said the reason to reevaluate replacing Asia is a “recent US position within NATO.” A new prime minister in Canada, Mark Carney, has directed a review of that country’s $13 billion contract for 88 F-35s. Plans for Germany to buy 35 of these aircraft are now also in doubt.
Developed over 30 years for the US and 19 allied nations, the F-35 has been marred by multiple failures, including cost overruns and technical difficulties. These problems notwithstanding, it is still one of the world’s most advanced combat aircraft, with low-observable (stealth) characteristics and advanced sensors.
Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace industry specialist, said that while he lauded the F-35’s capabilities, if NATO allies dropped their support, it could diminish the alliance’s cohesion. Some benefits of standardised equipment were emphasised by Mac Thornberry, former US representative and also member of the US Joint Strike Fighter programme.
For nations seeking alternatives, the Saab JAS-39 Gripen, made in Sweden, has bubbled up to be a candidate. Less stealthy than the Rafale, the Gripen can be faster, has a greater range, and has lower operational expenses.
Whether transatlantic defence cooperation survives the elections remains uncertain due to the simmering tensions between the US and its NATO allies. Such moves have the potential to impact NATO capabilities and partnerships extensively.