New Delhi: Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw’s recent revelation that he’s gradually switching to the homegrown Zoho browser has ignited curiosity about digital sovereignty.
In an era where Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Safari, and Opera dominate, the question arises: how does a country craft its web browser, and what permissions are needed? As India pushes for indigenous tech amid global scrutiny, experts decode the intricate blueprint.
At its core, a web browser is software that deciphers internet code — HTML, CSS, and JavaScript — into user-friendly visuals like text, images, videos, and layouts. Creating one demands a multidisciplinary team: software developers, UI designers, security specialists, testers, and debuggers. Proficiency in languages like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, C++, or Rust is essential.
The journey begins with selecting or building a rendering engine — the heart that converts code to pages. Popular open-source options include Blink (Chrome’s backbone), Gecko (Firefox), and WebKit (Safari). Nations can fork these under permissive licences like BSD or MPL, but must adhere to terms. Is it possible to forge a custom engine? It’s feasible but incurs massive technical and financial hurdles.
No central “permission” body exists for browser creation, unlike app stores. However, compliance with global standards from W3C (web architecture), IETF (protocols), and ICANN (domain systems) is non-negotiable for seamless website rendering. Rigorous testing — W3C conformance, security audits, performance benchmarks, multi-device compatibility — ensures reliability.
For national browsers, cybersecurity certification from agencies like India’s CERT-In is crucial, especially if blocking features align with IT laws. Vaishnaw’s endorsement of Zoho highlights its appeal: it promotes self-reliance without creating unnecessary complexity. As cyber threats loom, could more countries follow suit?
Comments are closed.